Guardian Unlimited
Go to:
Guardian UnlimitedSpecial reports
Home UK Business Online World dispatch The wrap Weblog Talk Search
The Guardian World News guide Arts Special reports Columnists Audio Help Quiz

Special report Iraq

Search this site

Go to...
Special report: Iraq

Iraq archived articles

In this section
Get real, Blair tells European critics of America

Blair to have private audience with Pope

Liberation plea to UK

Exiles cited by PM are backed by Iran

Leader: Blair must not let Bush bring him down

Dan Plesch: Operation regime change

Iraq parades outspoken scientist

Polly Toynbee: Ministers, dust down your dreams

Iraq faces ultimatum in second UN resolution

Jonathan Freedland: What would you suggest?

Leader: Message to Baghdad

Eastern Europe dismayed at Chirac snub

12 leading historians on both sides of the argument over Iraq

Army still in danger from friendly fire

David Ramsbotham: The military argument against attacking Iraq


US claims on Iraq called into question

Inspectors pick holes in Powell allegations and call for patience in carefully coded message to council

Jonathan Steele
Saturday February 15, 2003
The Guardian

Colin Powell's long dossier of Iraq's alleged non-compliance came under withering attack from the chief UN weapons inspectors yesterday. They said they found several elements of his evidence either false or unconvincing.

Hans Blix picked on two satellite images of a chemical warfare site, which the US secretary of state told the security council, in his 90-minute presentation last week, proved Iraq was engaged in deception.

Mr Powell had shown two photographs of the site at Al Musayyib, taken in May and July last year. The site was used to trans-ship chemical weapons from production facilities out to the field, he said.

On the first occasion there was what Mr Powell described as a "decontamination vehicle associated with biological and chemical weapons activity". Two months later the vehicle had gone and the site had been bulldozed and graded, he said.

But Mr Blix made it clear he found the pictures unconvincing. "The reported movement of munitions at the site could just as easily have been a routine activity as a movement of proscribed munitions in anticipation of an imminent inspection," he said.

He accepted that governments had many sources of information that were not available to the inspectors, but he added drily: "Inspectors must base their reports only on evidence which they can themselves examine and present publicly. Without evidence, confidence cannot arise."

The thinly veiled attack on Mr Powell's case for war by the chief arms inspectors adds to the problems the US and Britain are facing in making their argument on the world stage. Last week a similar British dossier was discredited when it became clear that it had been compiled from old academic papers which it had passed off as partly drawn from "intelligence".

Mr Powell last week made much of an engine testing stand for which he also showed the security council satellite pictures. It was "clearly intended for long-range missiles that can fly 1,200 kilometres", he claimed, adding: "These are missiles that Iraq wants in order to project power, to threaten, and to deliver chemical, biological and - if we let him - nuclear warheads."

Iraq last week rebutted the US charges, arguing that the testing stand had a longer exhaust facility than earlier ones only because it was set up horizontally rather than vertically.

In his report yesterday, Mr Blix came down closer to the Iraqi position. "So far, the test stand has not been associated with proscribed activity," he said. In other words, there was no evidence it had been used in ways deemed illegal under UN resolutions.

Mr Blix also cast doubt on Mr Powell's claims that Iraqi officials had been tapping the inspectors' telephones and hastily moving material from sites shortly before the inspectors arrived. "In no case have we seen convincing evidence that the Iraqi side knew in advance that the inspectors were coming," Mr Blix said.

Speaking after Mr Blix, Mohamed El Baradei, the chief nuclear inspector and director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), also questioned Mr Powell's claims. He referred to documents removed from an Iraqi scientist's home. Mr Powell had said the 2,000 pages had been found thanks to intelligence supplied to the inspectors.

Mr El Baradei said the documents referred to uranium enrichment using lasers. "Nothing contained in the documents alters the conclusions previously drawn by the IAEA concerning the extent of Iraq's laser enrichment programme," he said.

Special report

Hans Blix's report to the UN
14.02.2003: Full text: Hans Blix's briefing to the security council
14.02.2003: Full text: Mohammed el-Baradei's briefing to the security council

Hear Hans Blix's report to the UN security council (23 min)

Interactive guides
Click-through graphics on Iraq

Voices on Iraq
Read our collection of 29 exclusive interviews

Comment and analysis
Comment and analysis on Iraq

Iraq: archive special

09.12.2002: Weapons inspections
04.10.2002: War with Iraq

The weblog
Weblog special: Iraq

News guide

Key documents
05.02.2003: Full text of Colin Powell's speech to the UN
Sites visited by the UN weapons inspectors
20.12.2002: Colin Powell's statement on Iraq's weapons declaration
20.12.2002: UN security council resolution 1441 on Iraq
UK government dossier on human rights abuses in Iraq (pdf)
UK government dossier on Iraq's military capability (pdf)

In pictures
Saddam Hussein's inner circle
10 years after the Gulf war

Anti-war movement
Special report: the anti-war movement
28.01.2003: Guide to anti-war websites

Useful links
Arab Gateway: Iraq briefing
Middle East Daily
Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
Iraq sanctions - UN security council
UN special commission on Iraq

Printable version | Send it to a friend | Read it later | See saved stories


Guardian Unlimited Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003