Guardian Unlimited
Go to:
The ObserverSpecial reports
Home UK news International Politics Business Comment Leaders Focus
Sport Review Magazine Screen Travel Cash Letters Food

Iraq: Observer special (story)

Text-only version
Send it to a friend
Read it later
See saved stories

The Observer
Front page
Story index

Recent articles
Iraq bidder's apartheid past

Chasing riches in the ruins

Cronies set to make a killing

The human face of TV war

Focus: If Baghdad doesn't fall, it will crumble

The fight yet to come

Leader: Peace will bring new challenges

End in sight to riddle of missing US airman

Mary Riddell: A morally hollow victory

Kurds fight to win back their lands

What is happening? The key questions

French march ditched as riots feared

A very Roman lesson for today

US tells how its troops rescued Army heroine

Fighting erupts as US troops roar into Saddam's capital

The Guardian
Front page
Story index


Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war

Secret document details American plan to bug phones and emails of key Security Council members

Read the memo

Talk about it: dirty tricks?

Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy in New York and Peter Beaumont
Sunday March 2, 2003
The Observer

The United States is conducting a secret 'dirty tricks' campaign against UN Security Council delegations in New York as part of its battle to win votes in favour of war against Iraq.

Details of the aggressive surveillance operation, which involves interception of the home and office telephones and the emails of UN delegates in New York, are revealed in a document leaked to The Observer.

The disclosures were made in a memorandum written by a top official at the National Security Agency - the US body which intercepts communications around the world - and circulated to both senior agents in his organisation and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency asking for its input.

The memo describes orders to staff at the agency, whose work is clouded in secrecy, to step up its surveillance operations 'particularly directed at... UN Security Council Members (minus US and GBR, of course)' to provide up-to-the-minute intelligence for Bush officials on the voting intentions of UN members regarding the issue of Iraq.

The leaked memorandum makes clear that the target of the heightened surveillance efforts are the delegations from Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan at the UN headquarters in New York - the so-called 'Middle Six' delegations whose votes are being fought over by the pro-war party, led by the US and Britain, and the party arguing for more time for UN inspections, led by France, China and Russia.

The memo is directed at senior NSA officials and advises them that the agency is 'mounting a surge' aimed at gleaning information not only on how delegations on the Security Council will vote on any second resolution on Iraq, but also 'policies', 'negotiating positions', 'alliances' and 'dependencies' - the 'whole gamut of information that could give US policymakers an edge in obtaining results favourable to US goals or to head off surprises'.

Dated 31 January 2003, the memo was circulated four days after the UN's chief weapons inspector Hans Blix produced his interim report on Iraqi compliance with UN resolution 1441.

It was sent by Frank Koza, chief of staff in the 'Regional Targets' section of the NSA, which spies on countries that are viewed as strategically important for United States interests.

Koza specifies that the information will be used for the US's 'QRC' - Quick Response Capability - 'against' the key delegations.

Suggesting the levels of surveillance of both the office and home phones of UN delegation members, Koza also asks regional managers to make sure that their staff also 'pay attention to existing non-UN Security Council Member UN-related and domestic comms [office and home telephones] for anything useful related to Security Council deliberations'.

Koza also addresses himself to the foreign agency, saying: 'We'd appreciate your support in getting the word to your analysts who might have similar more indirect access to valuable information from accesses in your product lines [ie, intelligence sources].' Koza makes clear it is an informal request at this juncture, but adds: 'I suspect that you'll be hearing more along these lines in formal channels.'

Disclosure of the US operation comes in the week that Blix will make what many expect to be his final report to the Security Council.

It also comes amid increasingly threatening noises from the US towards undecided countries on the Security Council who have been warned of the unpleasant economic consequences of standing up to the US.

Sources in Washington familiar with the operation said last week that there had been a division among Bush administration officials over whether to pursue such a high-intensity surveillance campaign with some warning of the serious consequences of discovery.

The existence of the surveillance operation, understood to have been requested by President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, is deeply embarrassing to the Americans in the middle of their efforts to win over the undecided delegations.

The language and content of the memo were judged to be authentic by three former intelligence operatives shown it by The Observer. We were also able to establish that Frank Koza does work for the NSA and could confirm his senior post in the Regional Targets section of the organisation.

The NSA main switchboard put The Observer through to extension 6727 at the agency which was answered by an assistant, who confirmed it was Koza's office. However, when The Observer asked to talk to Koza about the surveillance of diplomatic missions at the United Nations, it was then told 'You have reached the wrong number'.

On protesting that the assistant had just said this was Koza's extension, the assistant repeated that it was an erroneous extension, and hung up.

While many diplomats at the UN assume they are being bugged, the memo reveals for the first time the scope and scale of US communications intercepts targeted against the New York-based missions.

The disclosure comes at a time when diplomats from the countries have been complaining about the outright 'hostility' of US tactics in recent days to persuade then to fall in line, including threats to economic and aid packages.

The operation appears to have been spotted by rival organisations in Europe. 'The Americans are being very purposeful about this,' said a source at a European intelligence agency when asked about the US surveillance efforts.

Special reports
Iraq crisis: Observer special
Special report: Iraq
Special report: the anti-war movement
Observer Worldview

Exclusive: UN dirty tricks
02.03.2003: Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war
02.03.2003: Bugging plan: read the US memo
Talk: US dirty tricks

In Iraq
02.03.2003: Iraq destroys missiles in last-ditch bid to avoid war
02.03.2003: Kurds in fear of Turkish motives

The UN divided
02.03.2003: Focus: America the arm-twister
02.03.2003: Profile: Jacques the juggler
02.03.2003: The diplomatic gridlock
02.03.2003: Nick Taylor: Guinea's moment of fame
02.03.2003: Weekly briefing

High drama at Westminster
02.03.2003: Focus: Blair's high wire act
02.03.2003: Win or bust for Blair
Special report: Parliamentary debate in full
Guardian Unlimited Politics

After the vote
02.03.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: Journey into the unknown
02.03.2003: Michael Portillo: Labour won't forgive
02.03.2003: Roy Hattersley: The days of obedience are over
02.03.2003: Mary Warnock: Any war demands morality

Iraq crisis: Observer Comment
02.03.2003: Leader: Blair must win the argument
02.03.2003: Nick Cohen: The only way to peace
02.03.2003: Peter Preston: Balance will be the first casualty
02.03.2003: Terry Jones: Tony Blair and the hawks
02.03.2003: Rosemary Hollis: A diplomatic solution?
02.03.2003: Business focus: Attacking the state
02.03.2003: Bulent Yusuf: Global press week
Email your views to

The Business of War
02.03.2003: The first privatised war
02.03.2003: Firms with friends in high places
02.03.2003: OK, who forgot the toilet rolls?
02.02.2003: Vincent Cable: The economic consequences of war

Terror threat
02.03.2003: Top 9/11 suspect seized in Pakistan
02.03.2003: Saudi envoy in UK linked to 9/11
War on Terrorism: Observer special

Iraq after Saddam
23.02.2003: Val Percival: Lessons from Kosovo
16.02.2003: Iraqi opposition slams plan for military governor
16.02.2003: Kanan Makiya: Our hopes betrayed
Talk: Iraq's democrats betrayed?
09.02.2003: Focus: The Iraq Bush will build
09.02.2003: Robert L Barry: The next Yugoslavia?

Observer highlights: the broadest debate
19.01.2003: Leader: Why force may be needed
Talk: Where do you stand on Iraq?
16.02.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: It's do or die, Prime Minister
16.02.2003: Tony Blair: The price of my conviction
09.02.2003: Mary Riddell: With Bible and bombs
16.02.2003: Nick Cohen: The Left isn't listening
23.02.2003: William Shawcross: Why Saddam will never disarm
16.02.2003: Dan Plesch: Disarm Saddam without war
23.02.2003: Focus: Twilight of a tyrant
16.02.2003: Focus: Worlds apart on war
16.02.2003: Henry Porter: One rule for Israel, another for Saddam
26.01.2003: Charles Kennedy: We're being bulldozed into war
16.02.2003: Leader: We must not rule out war
09.02.2003: Leader: The dossier that shamed Britain
26.01.2003: Letters: What you say about our stand on Iraq
16.02.2003: Mary Riddell: The great unheard finally speak out
09.02.2003: Jason Burke: Powell doesn't know who he is up against
02.02.2003: David Aaronovitch: Why the Left is wrong on Saddam
16.02.2003: Anthony Sampson: Why Britain's war?
09.02.2003: Jason Burke: The missing link?
19.01.2003: Debate: What prominent Britons think
02.02.2003: Gil Loescher: The refugee crisis
26.01.2003: Mary Riddell: Don't disdain the doves
26.01.2003: Terry Jones: My neighbour trouble
05.01.2003: Nick Cohen: Saddam won't run
14.07.2002: John Pilger: The great charade
29.12.2002: Ken Nichols: Back to Iraq as a human shield
15.09.2002: Jason Burke: Return to Kurdistan
01.09.2002: Dilip Hiro: US blind eye to poison gas
11.08.2002: Nick Cohen: Who will save Iraq?
04.08.2002: Richard Harries: Not a just war
25.08.2002: Christopher Hitchens: With friends like these
22.09.2002: Terry Jones: The audacious courage of Mr Blair
22.09.2002: Rosemary Hollis: Hawks won't stop with Baghdad
11.08.2002: Mark Leonard: Could the left back war?
17.03.2002: John Lloyd: Anti-Americanism betrays the left
17.02.2002: Terry Jones: George's friendly bombs
02.12.2001: David Rose: The doves are wrong - again

Special reports
Iraq: Observer special
Observer Worldview
Terrorism crisis
Islam and the West

More global commentary
More from Peter Beaumont
More from Jason Burke
More from Ed Vulliamy
More from Mark Leonard
More from Dan Plesch
Worldview highlights: debating American power

Useful links
UN resolutions on Iraq
British Foreign Office: Relations with Iraq
US State Department Iraq Update - Iraq resources
Campaign against Sanctions on Iraq
Centre for non-proliferation studies


Guardian Unlimited Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003